Productive behavior of Psidium salutare (H.B.K) Bergen in the La Lechuza area, Los Palacios municipality
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The agroforestry system based on Psidium salutare (H.B.K.) Berg in the La Lechuza area, Pinar del Río, presents low levels of productivity, which limits its economic potential in the region. The objective of this work was to evaluate the functioning levels of this production system. A diagnosis was used based on indicators of efficiency, conservation of natural resources, diversity, fragility, capacity for change, self-sufficiency and recycling. The methodology was based on the participatory approach. The results showed that, although Psidium salutare production has improved slightly in recent years, the system depends excessively on this monoculture, which limits diversification and economic stability. Despite the lack of adequate conservation measures for soil and water, the area has favorable biological diversity thanks to its proximity to other natural ecosystems. Return on costs is uncertain due to dependence on seasonal production, which increases risks for producers. It is concluded that, although the system offers environmental and economic benefits, it is necessary to integrate conservation, diversification and adaptation practices to climate change to improve its resilience and long-term sustainability.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
How to Cite
References
Arévalo, G., & Gauggel, C. (2011). Manual de prácticas del curso de Manejo de suelos y nutrición vegetal. Carrera de Ciencia y Producción Agropecuaria, E.A.P.
Godar, J., Tizado, E. J., Pokorny, B., & Johnson, J. (2012). Typology and Characterization of Amazon Colonists: A Case Study Along the Transamazon Highway. Human Ecology, 40(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9457-8
Huerta, E., Kampichler, C., Ochoa-Gaona, S., Jong, B. D., Hernandez-Daumas, S., & Geissen, V. (2014). A Multi-Criteria Index for Ecological Evaluation of Tropical Agriculture in Southeastern Mexico. PLOS ONE, 9(11), e112493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112493
Jadán, O., Günter, S., Torres, B., & Selesi, D. (2014). Riqueza y potencial maderable en sistemas agroforestales tradicionales como alternativa al uso del bosque nativo, Amazonia del Ecuador. Revista Forestal Mesoamericana Kurú, 12(28). https://doi.org/10.18845/rfmk.v12i28.2096
Kharrazi, A., Fath, B., & Katzmair, H. (2016). Advancing Empirical Approaches to the Concept of Resilience: A Critical Examination of Panarchy, Ecological Information, and Statistical Evidence. Sustainability, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090935
Pereira, R., & Quacchia, S. A. (2009). Desafios na construção de indicadores de sustentabilidade. Ambiente & Sociedade, 12(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2009000200007
Sarandón, S. J., & Flores, C. C. (2014). Agroecología: Bases teóricas para el diseño y manejo de agroecosistemas sustentables. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata (EDULP). https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/37280
Virginio, E. de M., Caicedo, C. E., & Astorga, C. (2014). Agroforestería Sostenible en la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. CATIE-INIAP. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271203962_Agroforesteria_Sostenible_en_la_Amazonia_Ecuatoriana